Re: ardour 2.4 was out

["Nicholas Manojlovic" <nicholasmanojlovic@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think I preferred it when Ardour was in the CCRMA repo. Not only was it quicker, I trust its been built with music in mind.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> ZC Miao wrote:
> > [quote]
> > Ardour 2.4 released
> > Submitted by paul on Mon, 2008-03-31 21:03. :: Articles
> > Well, its over a month later than expected, but Ardour 2.4 is finally
> > here. A respectable list of new features, many small improvements and an
> > important set of bug fixes make up the news for this one. Read more
> > below ...
> > [/quote]
> >
> > So, when will we get it in F8?
> >
>
> In F-8, I dunno, it is on its way to rawhide / F-9 beta now. Considering that
> this not purely a bug fix release I'm not sure if we want to release this as an
> update to F-8. What do others on this list think?

I would release it on Fedora 8. It has bug fixes and I think other users
would probably appreciate having the latest.

> You could grab the srpm from rawhide and build it for F-8, and provide us with
> some feedback on it, that might help.

I'll probably try a release in the Planet CCRMA testing repos...
-- Fernando

_______________________________________________
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list

_______________________________________________
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list