On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 08:02 +1000, Nicholas Manojlovic wrote: > I think I preferred it when Ardour was in the CCRMA repo. Not only was > it quicker, I trust its been built with music in mind. I don't think there is any difference re: packaging between the Fedora and Planet CCRMA repositories (if anything Fedora packages should be better quality because of peer review, etc, etc). But that should not translate normally into any audible or musical differences. The slower turn around is a direct consequence of how Fedora works and is, I believe, unavoidable. -- Fernando > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano > <nando@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > ZC Miao wrote: > > > [quote] > > > Ardour 2.4 released > > > Submitted by paul on Mon, 2008-03-31 21:03. :: Articles > > > Well, its over a month later than expected, but Ardour 2.4 > is finally > > > here. A respectable list of new features, many small > improvements and an > > > important set of bug fixes make up the news for this one. > Read more > > > below ... > > > [/quote] > > > > > > So, when will we get it in F8? > > > > > > > In F-8, I dunno, it is on its way to rawhide / F-9 beta now. > Considering that > > this not purely a bug fix release I'm not sure if we want to > release this as an > > update to F-8. What do others on this list think? > > > I would release it on Fedora 8. It has bug fixes and I think > other users > would probably appreciate having the latest. > > > You could grab the srpm from rawhide and build it for F-8, > and provide us with > > some feedback on it, that might help. > > > I'll probably try a release in the Planet CCRMA testing > repos... > _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
