Re: ardour 2.4 was out

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Nicholas Manojlovic wrote:

Packaging conventions and rules, I guess.

I like the idea of the Fedora music sig a lot, but it seems to be in a
half-half state. I realise I'm being ridiculously critical here, because I
haven't contributed. But it feels like it took the best things from CCRMA
and made them more 'generic' and not as specialised. I may be wrong.

Maybe this is a fair point.

Really, I first envisioned this as a way to help bring CCRMA and Fedora together. Because the fact is, most of the CCRMA stuff should live in Fedora anyway. But the fact that CCRMA requires the RT kernel and other non-standard stuff may make that difficult.

The real question, to me, is what about CCRMA makes it impossible to roll the CCRMA bits directly into Fedora proper? And what can we do to fix those things?

This is the kind of thing we could/should be discussing on this list.

--g

--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
Community Development Manager
Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
"To whomsoever much hath been given...
...from him much shall be asked"

_______________________________________________
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux