Re: ardour 2.4 was out

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Packaging conventions and rules, I guess.

I like the idea of the Fedora music sig a lot, but it seems to be in a half-half state. I realise I'm being ridiculously critical here, because I haven't contributed. But it feels like it took the best things from CCRMA and made them more 'generic' and not as specialised. I may be wrong.



On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nicholas Manojlovic wrote:
I think I preferred it when Ardour was in the CCRMA repo. Not only was it quicker, I trust its been built with music in mind.


What do you mean by "built with music in mind"?  What else would we build it for?

AG


_______________________________________________
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux