On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/23/2013 01:43 PM, zacharias.mitzelos@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> And also byfollowing the default is open method, that's why we >> decided to make a mailing list on our own, to discuss about any issues on >> the >> magazine with all the users. And we don't limit the discussions to bugs >> on the magazine only, but to bring all discussions regarding the >> magazine on this list. And we also want our visitors (and developers >> ofc) to communicate with us (stuff) in a way. And not having them >> contacting the marketing list ;) > > > I don't understand the problem with contacting the marketing list. Can you > perhaps make it clear to me how magazine-related discussions are not > marketing-related and why they should be separate? > > >> I don't think that making this list is "a too much". And needless to >> say that any major changes on the magazine will be forwarded on the >> marketing list so everyone can comment(eg. Fedora calendar). We don't >> want to separate the magazine from the marketing team. ;) > > > I'm not talking only about major changes, though - I'm talking about any > general discussion. > > The magazine should be a core part of the marketing effort, IMHO. Having it > require two lists seems counter-intuitive to that. > > >> PS: the idea was discussed on our weekly meeting and no one >> disagreed with that. > > > Unfortunately, I was unable to make the meeting due to being in new hire > orientation, or I would have disagreed. This is one of the reasons I like > Apache's approach of taking decisions on the mailing list and having a > 72-hour window to discuss things... by default, there's always someone who > can't make a meeting due to time zone issues, work commitments, etc. Welcome to Fedora Joe. Causing trouble right out of the gate, you are going to fit right in. :) John -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
