On 01/18/2011 04:54 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:36:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:00:51 +0530 >> Rahul Sundaram<metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I would suggest: >>> >>> EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository >>> and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds >>> and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community >>> project maintained and supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and >>> mailing lists) as part of the Fedora Project and is not commercially >>> supported by Red Hat. >> >> Sounds good to me. :) > > Englishy wordsmithing: > > The collection of EPEL 6 packages is a complementary and compatible > add-on repository for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds. It provides > additional packages and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is > a community project, maintained and supported by volunteers via > Bugzilla and mailing lists. It is part of the Fedora Project and is > not commercially supported by Red Hat. We should use "supplementary" instead of "complementary". There's a subtle difference in the meanings: the former connotes that a thing is additional to the whole, whereas the latter connotes that the whole is not complete without the thing. Also, "Red Hat, Inc."? -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
