On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:54:03 -0500 "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:36:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:00:51 +0530 > > Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I would suggest: > > > > > > EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on > > > repository and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or > > > compatible rebuilds and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. > > > EPEL is a community project maintained and supported by > > > volunteers (via bugzilla and mailing lists) as part of the Fedora > > > Project and is not commercially supported by Red Hat. > > > > Sounds good to me. :) > > Englishy wordsmithing: > > The collection of EPEL 6 packages is a complementary and compatible > add-on repository for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds. It provides > additional packages and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is > a community project, maintained and supported by volunteers via > Bugzilla and mailing lists. It is part of the Fedora Project and is > not commercially supported by Red Hat. Even better. ;) Thanks for the feedback... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
