On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:13:43 +0530 Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You might want to note two things. A) It is fully compatible with > RHEL 6 and does not replace or conflict with anything in the base > repository and that EPEL enforces this via a policy. B) This is a > community repository and not commercially supported by Red Hat. ok. How about a second paragraph that reads: EPEL6 packages never replace RHEL6 packages, only build on them and are fully compatible with RHEL6. EPEL is a community supported and maintained project, and it's packages are not commercially supported by Red Hat. Or should that read better at the end? Thanks for the feedback! kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
