On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would suggest:
EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community project maintained and supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and mailing lists) as part of the Fedora Project and is not commercially supported by Red Hat.
Rahul
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:13:43 +0530ok. How about a second paragraph that reads:
Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You might want to note two things. A) It is fully compatible with
> RHEL 6 and does not replace or conflict with anything in the base
> repository and that EPEL enforces this via a policy. B) This is a
> community repository and not commercially supported by Red Hat.
EPEL6 packages never replace RHEL6 packages, only build on them and
are fully compatible with RHEL6. EPEL is a community supported and
maintained project, and it's packages are not commercially supported by
Red Hat.
Or should that read better at the end?
I would suggest:
EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community project maintained and supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and mailing lists) as part of the Fedora Project and is not commercially supported by Red Hat.
Rahul
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
