On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:32:50AM -0800, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 01/18/2011 04:54 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:36:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:00:51 +0530 > >> Rahul Sundaram<metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> I would suggest: > >>> > >>> EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository > >>> and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds > >>> and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community > >>> project maintained and supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and > >>> mailing lists) as part of the Fedora Project and is not commercially > >>> supported by Red Hat. > >> > >> Sounds good to me. :) > > > > Englishy wordsmithing: > > > > The collection of EPEL 6 packages is a complementary and compatible > > add-on repository for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds. It provides > > additional packages and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is > > a community project, maintained and supported by volunteers via > > Bugzilla and mailing lists. It is part of the Fedora Project and is > > not commercially supported by Red Hat. > > > We should use "supplementary" instead of "complementary". There's a > subtle difference in the meanings: the former connotes that a thing is > additional to the whole, whereas the latter connotes that the whole is > not complete without the thing. Just so -- tip of the fedora to you for catching that! > Also, "Red Hat, Inc."? +0.5, at least. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
