> > On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 06:28 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 10:00 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> >> >>> After a bit of funging, I've got a spec and a few patches which >> conform >> >>> to >> >>> the above. I contacted upstream about the name, and got no >> response. >> >>> The >> >>> name I'm currently working under is WeaselCycles. >> >>> >> >>> Anyone want to see it, and/or offer suggestions before I submit it >> for >> >>> review? >> >> >> >> The code change looks ok on a first pass, you need to do the docs as >> >> well. >> > >> > If you look at the html docs included in the RPM, you'll see that they >> are >> > affected by the change in the configure file. >> > >> >> Also, the spec file from upstream makes me cry. Please rewrite it. :) >> > >> > I know, I could hear the kittens screaming when I read it. I intend >> to, >> > once the name is sorted out. :) >> >> When I mentioned that I'd altered the logo, there were eager suggestions >> from upstream to provide us with a version of the logo reflecting the >> name >> change. Is it ok to include the project's URL, >> http://www.armagetronad.net, in the logo? It's not a deal-breaker if >> it's >> not. > > I'm going to say its OK, as we're not calling the software the URL. I've got approval for the new name, Armacycles Advanced, and they've provided a new logo. I've also cleaned up the spec. Any reason not to submit for review? > ~spot > -- novus ordo absurdum _______________________________________________ Fedora-games-list mailing list Fedora-games-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list
