Re: last prboom update

[Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx>]

Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Nicu Buculei wrote:
> > It also look like using software rendering instead of OpenGL (I 
> > understood from an earlier message it was supposed to use exclusively 
> > OpenGL)
>
> OK, I figured this: that was the case for 2.4.1-1, the latest is 2.4.1-2 
> which install two binaries, one with OpenGL and another with software 
> rendering and the menu points to the software version.
> How about changing the launcher to point to the OpenGL version and leave 
> the other as a safe backup option available from the command line?

I think that software rendering is the safer default, or maybe even 
better a wrapper script which detects _true_ opengl support (using 
glxinfo?) and then chooses.

Regards,

Hans