Re: New Comps Groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > I'm in agreement with Bill on this.  Pretty much all the python-*
> > packages should be pulled in as dependencies.  Am I missing something
> > here?
> 
> It's pretty much impossible to autodetect missing comps entries unless
> every package is systematically put in comps. No autochecking means low
> QA.

What constitutes 'missing'? Just something that should be selectable but
isn't there? I would hope that those sorts of things would become apparent.

Bill

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux