Le lundi 27 novembre 2006 à 15:57 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > I'm in agreement with Bill on this. Pretty much all the python-* > > > packages should be pulled in as dependencies. Am I missing something > > > here? > > > > It's pretty much impossible to autodetect missing comps entries unless > > every package is systematically put in comps. No autochecking means low > > QA. > > What constitutes 'missing'? Just something that should be selectable but > isn't there? I would hope that those sorts of things would become apparent. A new package which has not been classified at all (ie the contributor "forgot" to think about comps at all) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
