Re: New Comps Groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 13:24 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> We already have a 'package search' interface for finding packages - is
> listing 100 (or however many) python-* packages better than this? In
> what way? Are they not getting pulled in for dependencies when necessary?

I'm in agreement with Bill on this.  Pretty much all the python-*
packages should be pulled in as dependencies.  Am I missing something
here?

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux