On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 18:18 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Add the OP's quote that is missing above and you'll see what you were > meaning with "part of a python's module". I replied to the original > post of yours, where all the context is present and I think it's quite > clear. *sigh* Here is where the fun began. I was reading and replying to the original poster's mail which said: > I am working on packaging cohoba, this is a python gui client/mission > control for telepathy. It has one small .c file, so I have a few > questions: > - because of the .c file the package has to by arch-specific i guess. Is > there a strong preference to package as noarch? (the c part is used for > changing the name for killall, so to put it as noarch i can just leave > that part out (not being able to killall cohoba), or add a dependency on > python-ctypes and add a small patch to cohoba to use ctypes to do it > instead) Here it is impossible to tell if the .c file is part of the python module or not. Unfortunately I saw the second message land and overquoted it. My reply was geared toward the original post. However you still assumed that my text, which takes about a python module and nothing more, meant something I did not say. But while we bicker about this, it accomplishes nothing, just makes both our days a little less joyful. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
