Re: python noarch vs arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 16:34 +0200, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am working on packaging cohoba, this is a python gui client/mission
> control for telepathy. It has one small .c file, so I have a few
> questions:
> - because of the .c file the package has to by arch-specific i guess. Is
> there a strong preference to package as noarch? (the c part is used for
> changing the name for killall, so to put it as noarch i can just leave
> that part out (not being able to killall cohoba), or add a dependency on
> python-ctypes and add a small patch to cohoba to use ctypes to do it
> instead)
> 
i didn't want to send yet, so i'll continue:
- should i just not care about arch vs noarch and package as arch
specific, then where must i place the modules, all in python_sitelib and
only osutils (the c one) in python_sitearch?

thanks for any pointers

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux