On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:25:58PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > Here it is impossible to tell if the .c file is part of the python > module or not. You need to decide on your use of the word module. You use it interchangably for a patchon package and a single-file module. If you mean a "module" as in package, then you agree that the statement was wrong, or not? If you mean a "module" as in a single file, then it doesn't make sense to discuss about python and C code in one file embedded together. So the original statement used "module" while you meant the totality of all modules and was wrong to advice to pull everything under sitearch. If the statement was meaning a proper single file python module it would be technically correct, but it would make no sense, as there is no python/C mixing in the same file. > However you still assumed that my text, which takes about a python > module and nothing more, meant something I did not say. But while we > bicker about this, it accomplishes nothing, just makes both our days a > little less joyful. Putting some misconceptions straight is important as they stay in the archives, get implemented in packages, copied over in other packages and become a defacto "truth". This is not bickering, and my days are miserable anyway ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp1jfPOPJaTG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
