On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:52:27AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 17:47 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > Just check your statement again. You outruled coexistence of python > > modules in both lib and lib64 and there are real-life counterexamples > > to that. What's more to not see??? > > Again I think we're talking past each other. I'm saying that a single > python's module can't _both_ be in /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 at the SAME > TIME. You can't have > > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum and > /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/yum > > especially with different contents in each. Is what I'm saying clear > now? I agree with the above, but that was not what you were saying. I won't bother copying your quote back again, you seem to have a reason why you're trimming it ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpwwsYwt8pmi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
