On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:16:08PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 18:11 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > OK, here is the original quoting. A user has both arch specific and > > non-arch specific parts of a package and needs to decide which parts > > to place under sitelib and which under sitearch. > > > > Jesse's (wrong) answer is that if one needs to get into sitearch it > > pulls the rest into there, too. It's not about files with the same > > name under sitearch and sitelib as Jesse later explained, it's about a > > package like python-elementtree and friends that has some parts that > > are arch specific and some parts that are not. And there is no need to > > move everything to sitearch contrary to Jesse's statement. > > > > Everything clear as mud? Removing too much in quoting generates this > > kind of confusion. > > No, too much assuming causes these problems. I said "Due to the way > that python works, if any part of a python's module". However you > assumed I was speaking about a python module PACKAGE. Now, did I say > Package? No, I said module. Pretty hard to remove a quote that didn't > exist. Please don't put words in my mouth. OK, so in your POV a user asked whether it is OK to place foo.py and bar.so in sitelib and sitearch respectively and you answer that baz.py can't be installed under both sitearch and sitelib. I think it's better to admit the original error instead. :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpf2Tue9bb2H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
