Enrico Scholz wrote:
rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Rex Dieter) writes:
Yes? That's the functionality I suggested, just expressed with a
different shell syntax. Combine something like the above and again,
_no_ dependencies on fedora-usermgmt in packages and I'm satisfied.
Sorry, that's a point where I insist on: when a Fedora Extras package
uses fedora-usermgmt, then it MUST have the corresponding 'Requires(...):
fedora-usermgmt'.
Creating undeterministic behavior by randomly executing plain 'useradd'
or 'fedora-useradd' is not my idea of package management.
It's not undeterministic. You've claimed that fedora-useradd is
*exactly* the same as regular useradd when not configured by the
sysadmin. So when/if fedora-usermgmt is installed or not shouldn't
make a difference, right? (-:
Ok, let's look at the following %package list for a kickstart (or any
other from-scratch) installation
OK, so I must've mis-read/mis-remembered past claims that
fedora-usermgmt in it's unconfigured state was the same as useradd.
-- Rex
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
