ville.skytta@xxxxxx (Ville Skyttä) writes: >> | %pre >> | if test -x /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd; then >> | /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd ... >> | else >> | /usr/sbin/useradd ... >> | fi >> >> with current fedora-usermgmt. > > Yes? That's the functionality I suggested, just expressed with a > different shell syntax. Combine something like the above and again, > _no_ dependencies on fedora-usermgmt in packages and I'm satisfied. Sorry, that's a point where I insist on: when a Fedora Extras package uses fedora-usermgmt, then it MUST have the corresponding 'Requires(...): fedora-usermgmt'. Creating undeterministic behavior by randomly executing plain 'useradd' or 'fedora-useradd' is not my idea of package management. >> This explicit activation can happen in the %pre script of kickstart. > > Surely the whole usermgmt package or necessary bits of its payload could > be installed there too. I forgot (should know my packages better): doing this kind of customization can and should be done in a package providing 'setup(fedora-usermgmt)'. You just need to add such a package to the kickstart %package list and with proper 'Requires(...): fedora-usermgmt' things should work. Enrico
Attachment:
pgpdzv4C3MjzP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
