On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 22:09 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > ville.skytta@xxxxxx (Ville Skyttä) writes: > > >> 3. Would it be really a problem to maintain another spec-file? > > > > Do I really have to answer that question? > > I think, it is wasted time to try to write spec-files which are running on > all and every distribution. Agreed, but I don't remember anyone mentioning trying that in this thread. The problems caused by dependencies on fedora-usermgmt occur way before the "all and every" phase. > | %pre > | if test -x /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd; then > | /usr/sbin/fedora-useradd ... > | else > | /usr/sbin/useradd ... > | fi > > with current fedora-usermgmt. Yes? That's the functionality I suggested, just expressed with a different shell syntax. Combine something like the above and again, _no_ dependencies on fedora-usermgmt in packages and I'm satisfied. > This explicit activation can happen in the %pre script of kickstart. Surely the whole usermgmt package or necessary bits of its payload could be installed there too. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
