On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:11:39PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I have one argument in favour of keeping the actual release notes > together with the distribution itself: future accessibility. In my > experience, the availability of ancillary bits that were *originally* > provided alongside some piece of software in some way is far less > reliable than the availability of the software itself. You can often > find the actual tarball (or whatever) of some random F/OSS release from > 2005, or 1995. It's much less likely that you'll find the associated Yeah, I guess this is a pretty compelling argument. On the other hand, I don't want to keep slipping releases for it, and I don't want the documentation at release time to be seen as frozen, like in-print books. Perhaps we can have a process where the package is automatically updated from any changes to the doc site? A "bots do the work" kind of thing. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
