On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 08:42:17PM -0400, Zach Oglesby wrote: > Now that we are on the new asciidoc/asciibinder system I was thinking > about the release notes RPM and the fact that the it was generated by > publican. Last I check the RPM is still a blocker for releases, and as > it stands now, we don't have a way to make this with the new source > docs. > > My personal preference would be to remove this as a requirement for > releases, but this needs to be discussed with a larger group of people > as I don't think we can just say this is not longer a release criteria. > I am not sure who we need to talk with (FESCo? RelEng?), but before we > talk to them we need to have a discussion about it here and figure out > what the docs team would like to see done so that we are talking with > one voice. Generally, the release criteria are owned by QA, so the test list would be the place to take this. We actually had issues with this at the last minute with the F26 release, and discovered that there was an approved proposal from 2015 to drop the requirement to have release notes on the media (see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/XDRUNGFVA36IP6IMBHYWFTQYZYDXKSZW/). The crition is now "The final branded and generic release notes must be present in the release repository." I propose we a) change "in the release repository" to "on the Fedora Docs website" and b) drop the part about "generic release notes"; since it won't be an RPM, that's not a hardship for remixes. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
