On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:05:48AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:11:39PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I have one argument in favour of keeping the actual release notes > > together with the distribution itself: future accessibility. In my > > experience, the availability of ancillary bits that were *originally* > > provided alongside some piece of software in some way is far less > > reliable than the availability of the software itself. You can often > > find the actual tarball (or whatever) of some random F/OSS release from > > 2005, or 1995. It's much less likely that you'll find the associated > Yeah, I guess this is a pretty compelling argument. On the other hand, Oh, look: https://www.xkcd.com/1909/ -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ docs mailing list -- docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to docs-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
