Re: Proposal: Rolling Release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:18 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
I fail to see how, for example, including a java-1.5.0-sun-compat package in the box, or maintaining a working relationship with the jpackage.org packagers would have compromised any sensible positions, yet it would have dramatically changed the user experience.

Which policy prevents this from happening?

I have no idea. Up through FC5, jpackage packages worked. Then some small subset of packages that looked like they had a jpackage history, not including any reasonable way to install Sun java were included in the fedora repo and fedora support was dropped in the jpackage repo. Probably unrelated, but around the same time, Sun Java 1.5 was included in the RHEL5 update repository. I basically gave up on getting any of it to work.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux