Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 23.10.2008 18:56, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Neither will the meaning of 'minimal' be. Will it have networking? > > Will it have yum? Will it have ssh? Will it speak my language? So on, > > and so forth. > > Not sure if my mind plays tricks with me, but I got the impression > that I hear something like the above as a "shoot the discussion down" > argument every few days right now... This is starting to annoy me, as > statements like the above don't lead anywhere: Decisions have to be > made; repeatably pointing out that it's hard to do them doesn't bring > us a tiny bit further. So please: > > Just let a group of interested people make a decision and realize it > as a feature for F11! Then we hopefully can get rid of this topic > (which seems to pop up every few weeks...). That /has/ been done (yes, I've been around since Red Hat 3.x days), and it made /never/ everybody happy, thus the recurring flamewars on the topic. When they say here that it _can't_ be solved it is not out of lazyness, it is out of (often bitter) experience. What is minimal for me is sorely lacking while barroquely bloated for the next interested party. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
