On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:08:00AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 18:45 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > I think that these are valid arguments, in my opinion you should just > > decide (as the release manager in chief or something like that ;-) for > > others, as there will never be an agreement. I think that it would be > > better to have yum, but understand perfectly that other are better with > > rpm only. > > The problem was the never ending bug parade and arguments on mailing > lists, trade shows, etc... Indeed that will happen. But does doing nothing really prevent it from happening? > We decided the only way to win this game was to not play at all, and we > let people decide their own definition of 'minimal'. The final word is up to you (and people in the release team) to choose between all theses possibilities (not very helpful, I know, but I think that there is no clear technically superior solution so you have to make your choice based on your 'expert' judgement). -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
