On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:40:09AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 18:13 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:29:11AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > > > Probably because you haven't been on the front line, taking the bug > > > reports, talking to users at events, trying to tweak the targets to > > > match expectation and continually failing because there is no singular > > > expectation. > > > > Indeed, so just come with what you prefer. With otr without python > > it will be better than what is now. > > Not sure what you mean by "otr". 'or' > When I raised a bit of objection over adding 'yum' to the @core list, > the responding argument was that if you're getting so specific in your > 'minimal' install, you're either doing a chroot type install or can > modify a groupdata set to strip it out for your install, whereas for all > the other cases it's better to have it there. I think that these are valid arguments, in my opinion you should just decide (as the release manager in chief or something like that ;-) for others, as there will never be an agreement. I think that it would be better to have yum, but understand perfectly that other are better with rpm only. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
