Re: yafray "renamed" to yafaray - pick it ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hi!
>
> As announced at http://www.yafray.org, yafaray replaces YafRay 0.0.9.
> Thus I'm thinking of submitting yafray as dead.package in Rawhide. (1)
>
> On the other side, I'm not going to work on yafaray soon. So, if anyone
> wants to start working on it, feel free.
>
> Nicolas (kwizart)
>
>
> (1), There is no reason why yafray should stop working with the current
> blender releases. But there might be a problem when theses two are
> installed together. (until now, blender either dlopen library or call
> binary, from yafray).
> This has to be discussed in the yafaray review. So, please cc'ed me on
> the review, along with your favorite reviewer. (or ask me as a reviewer).

I may just do that.  One thing though, am I blind or is there nor yafaray
tarball, and I'll have to work from a svn checkout?  (bleah)

>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux