2008/10/13 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Hi! >> >> As announced at http://www.yafray.org, yafaray replaces YafRay 0.0.9. >> Thus I'm thinking of submitting yafray as dead.package in Rawhide. (1) >> >> On the other side, I'm not going to work on yafaray soon. So, if anyone >> wants to start working on it, feel free. >> >> Nicolas (kwizart) >> >> >> (1), There is no reason why yafray should stop working with the current >> blender releases. But there might be a problem when theses two are >> installed together. (until now, blender either dlopen library or call >> binary, from yafray). >> This has to be discussed in the yafaray review. So, please cc'ed me on >> the review, along with your favorite reviewer. (or ask me as a reviewer). > > I may just do that. One thing though, am I blind or is there nor yafaray > tarball, and I'll have to work from a svn checkout? (bleah) Yes, that's right. I think it will be appropriate to use a script to create one source tarball. Good luck ! Nicolas (kwizart) >> >> -- >> fedora-devel-list mailing list >> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >> > > > -- > novus ordo absurdum > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
