On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 00:10 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:45:47PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 22:32 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > I had a look recently, and I think that comps are in a good shape for > > > minimal installs. (there is an issue with anaconda deps being draggued > > > in but it is an orthogonal issue). However chosing @core or @core + > > > @base is an unsolved (and unsolvable, in my opinion) issue. > > > > How so? You uncheck everything to get @core, you uncheck everything but > > the Base group to get @core + @base > > It isn't what I meant, I meant it is unsolvable to tell whether minimal > is @core or @code + @base. Right, because "minimal" is defined in the eye of the installer, IE the person doing the installing. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
