Re: [Fwd: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 20:46 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 06:25:11PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > 
> > Of _course_ it's not about specific cases. That would require actual
> > substantiated facts which can be verified or disproved; not just
> > handwaving and ranting.
> 
> I answered to Rex giving a specific case, regarding ConsoleKit and
> various dm breakage. You want the bugzilla entries or you trust me?

/me looks back...

On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 15:06 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> It is not that simple. The distinction between fedora and upstream in
> many cases is rather fuzzy. For example the hal/dbus/consoleKit/*Kit is
> put in fedora when it is at early development stages, and many of the
> developpers involved in these are also involved in fedora. And the
> changes are pushed in fedora without taking seriously the backward
> compatibility issues. For example wdm and xdm (and slim) are broken
> since consolekit replaced pam_console, and although there is a rather
> simple solution to integrate those dm it has never been planned and it
> is still not fixed, though a fix exist for months. As long as it worked
> in gdm it was fine for fedora. You can tell, hey, xdm, wdm and slim can
> copy what gdm does, but when the solution implemented in gdm is specific
> and not consistent with the previous designs, it is not so easy. Fedora
> controls some upstream so can do anything in these, but doesn't control
> all of them.

Yeah, that sucks. We should do better than that.

Although I've always been a little dubious about our 'Feature Process',
it does seem that it addresses this kind of problem. For the feature to
reach 100% completion, it should obviously involve fixes for the other
display managers. And there is a 'reversion plan' in case we don't
manage to complete the feature in time for the release. 

>From what you say above, it sounds like the ConsoleKit feature should be
declared incomplete, and we should be reverting it unless the feature
owners finish the job.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux