Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:42:08PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> >> I've never found that to be the case, no. Any third party work that >> "tried to co-operate" would be packaged as a Fedora package, and would >> be included in my above statement. > > Packages included in fedora have been broken for months or years now. Keep in mind that this discussion (imo) is more about general intentions, not specific cases. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
