Rex Dieter wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
A "put up or shut up" attitude has only been harmful in several
occasions before. You cannot win volunteers with remarks like that.
Well, seems like the community is being solely gobbled up by
individuals who are both negative and non constructive.
That shouldn't be surprising for a project that doesn't value backwards
compatibility, stability, or interoperability with any third party
components.
Blame too those upstream projects who introduce these changes, fedora is
just a collection of all those items.
So you'll ship any sort of breakage with no regard to the interfaces you
promoted last month?
Is there similar outrage against them as well? Where is it?
There are reasons that people run distributions instead of compiling the
head of every upstream source themselves. Consider the contrast between
RHEL's shielding users from incompatible upstream changes for many years
at a time to what fedora ships. I realize that it isn't easy or even
always possible to add new features without breaking old ones or
interfaces, but that's what people want. And it is what they are used
to from commercial OS's.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
