On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 12:07 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:42:08PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > >> I've never found that to be the case, no. Any third party work that > >> "tried to co-operate" would be packaged as a Fedora package, and would > >> be included in my above statement. > > > > Packages included in fedora have been broken for months or years now. > > Keep in mind that this discussion (imo) is more about general > intentions, not specific cases. Of _course_ it's not about specific cases. That would require actual substantiated facts which can be verified or disproved; not just handwaving and ranting. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
