On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 03:42:08PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I've never found that to be the case, no. Any third party work that > "tried to co-operate" would be packaged as a Fedora package, and would > be included in my above statement. Packages included in fedora have been broken for months or years now. You may think that these are not important packages, but still they are in fedora. Now as I told already fixing these packages or coming up with a design more backward compatible may entail some costs too, but having packages in fedora isn't a insurance against breakage. Gnome packages and major desktop package, sure will get a lot of love, but packages that are not 'mainstream' fedora won't be taken in consideration that much. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
