Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:47 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:25 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > 
> > [And yes, you are going to need to deal with infrastructure. Disk
> > space, cpu cycles, memory and power is not 'cheap' as much as people
> > think it is. Extra build boxes will be needed, extra disk space to
> > store stuff, and extra cpu cycles as Fedora's current infrastructure
> > is built on the assumption that it only needs to deal with X releases
> > for Y time. Adding to X and Y means more equipment needed. It will
> > also mean that someone's on the team are going ot have to focus on the
> > infrastructure problems as that addition also increases the number of
> > people needed to watch builds, etc.
> 
> along with infrastructure, you need a release engineer.
I guess, you will apply the same rationale when EPEL6 comes out?

Ralf



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux