On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) said: > > In the proposal the updated packages go to another repository, isn't > > that enough? I honestly don't think that FESCo would endorse such an attitude. > > If it's going to another repository... why do you need the same CVS > history? (To play devil's advocate.) Right. If this all shall make sense and remain unbureaucratic and efficient, there must not be any "other repo" nor "other VCS" nor distrust. Seems to me as if some people around here are resistant to learning? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
