On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:51:09AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) said: > > In the proposal the updated packages go to another repository, isn't > > that enough? I honestly don't think that FESCo would endorse such an attitude. > > If it's going to another repository... why do you need the same CVS > history? (To play devil's advocate.) In the long term, if the project has gained trust and approval from fedora and can be under the fedora umbrella it will be more simple. And even before it will be more simple... -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
