On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
If this all shall make sense and remain unbureaucratic and efficient,
there must not be any "other repo" nor "other VCS" nor distrust.
Seems to me as if some people around here are resistant to learning?
Learning what?
It seems folks proposing this madness failed to learn from how Fedora
Legacy failed.
I was there. During the last year or so (when the updates were still
being cranked out regularly), there were about 2 or 3 folks who would
review proposed updates or try to put any significant work in it.
Unless we get a list of 20 maintainer-capable people willing to spend
time in doing security fixes (for _any_ package, not just their pet
packages), we shouldn't even be wasting time discussing this.
Is there such a list? If you wish to continue with this, I'd suggest
you start collecting one at a wiki somewhere, where people could sign
and tell the terms under which they would be interested in
contributing.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
