Pekka Savola <pekkas <at> netcore.fi> writes:
> I was there. During the last year or so (when the updates were still
> being cranked out regularly), there were about 2 or 3 folks who would
> review proposed updates or try to put any significant work in it.
With no QA to worry about, that might even be enough.
And less bureaucracy, no separate infrastructure to worry about and ability to
reuse existing Fedora sponsorship instead of going through yet another
community process might help attract more packagers. (I intentionally don't use
the word "maintainers" here because I think more of a "bazaar" model where
whoever feels able to fix a given security hole can do it, only membership in
uberpackager (or maybe even only packager) required.)
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
