Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 20:00 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > If this all shall make sense and remain unbureaucratic and efficient,
> > there must not be any "other repo" nor "other VCS" nor distrust.
> >
> > Seems to me as if some people around here are resistant to learning?
> 
> Learning what?
Keeping things simple, avoiding bureaucracy, developing trust etc.

> It seems folks proposing this madness failed to learn from how Fedora 
> Legacy failed.
Legacy failed exactly for the reasons above: Separate VCS, separate
buildsystem, blownup bureaucracy, lack of collaboration, distrust.

Ralf





-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux