On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > > I was there. During the last year or so (when the updates were still > being cranked out regularly), there were about 2 or 3 folks who would > review proposed updates or try to put any significant work in it. Now there won't be a strict need for reviewers. After some time in bodhi things will get pushed, as it is the case in releases. Hopefully people will review the updates. As I said repeatedly, we won't ask more QA than what is in fedora release, and therefore not the amount that was in legacy. > Unless we get a list of 20 maintainer-capable people willing to spend > time in doing security fixes (for _any_ package, not just their pet > packages), we shouldn't even be wasting time discussing this. > > Is there such a list? If you wish to continue with this, I'd suggest > you start collecting one at a wiki somewhere, where people could sign > and tell the terms under which they would be interested in contributing. The conditions of such a project is what is discussed here. Having fedora infrastructure and fedora rules used or not is, in my opinion the most important item for potential contributors. I wanted to contribute to legacy but was deterred by the fact that another infra with another set of rules was used. And other people told the same. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
