Re: Package review backlog.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> I propose that each FESCo member should try to work on at least one  
> package review per week. Each week at the FESCo meeting all FESCo  
> members should be asked what they did (as FESCo member) over the past  
> week to improve Fedora; they further should be asked what they (as FESCo  
> member) plan for the coming week to improve Fedora. That includes, but  
> is not limited to reviews.

This seems rather silly - do other elected bodies make each member
justify their existence once per week? (It's not like we're normally
hurting for things to talk about during meetings.)

CVS logs are public records. Bugzilla is a more-or-less public record.
Meeting logs are a public record. The information is there if people
want to use it for voter education purposes.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux