Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:47:13PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Patrice Dumas wrote:
Of course. At least for me, I think that this idea is not worth pursuing
if the cost in term of infras manpower or even hardware and the like is
not almost nill (except for volunteers really interested in that).
Patrice,
It appears that 2.6.27 will be maintained for a longer period of time.
If this project gets started, you might want to keep track of this.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/742570/focus=743377
Except that over the life of F10, it will likely migrate to 2.6.28 and
therefore if/when a Fedora LTS gets created at the point that F10 is EOL,
the fact that 2.6.27 will be long-term maintained will be sort of irrelevant.
I can't predict the future. 2.6.27 hasn't been pushed to Fedora 9. Maybe
Patrice wants to start off with Fedora 8 or Fedora 9 instead of Fedora
10. Maybe 2.6.28 won't hit Fedora 10. It is a potentially useful data
point to consider. That's all.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
