Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:47:13PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
>
>> Of course. At least for me, I think that this idea is not worth pursuing
>> if the cost in term of infras manpower or even hardware and the like is
>> not almost nill (except for volunteers really interested in that).
>
> Patrice,
>
> It appears that 2.6.27 will be maintained for a longer period of time.  
> If this project gets started, you might want to keep track of this.
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/742570/focus=743377

Except that over the life of F10, it will likely migrate to 2.6.28 and
therefore if/when a Fedora LTS gets created at the point that F10 is EOL,
the fact that 2.6.27 will be long-term maintained will be sort of irrelevant.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux