Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 10:14 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >Answer: RHEL5 is not a replacement for a lifetime extended current
> >Fedora.
> 
> Extended for how long?  Fedora releases are supported for roughly
> 13 months (1 month after N+2 is released).  Actually longer if you
> take into account the slips that inevitably hit during each release
> cycle.
> 
> So, what _exactly_ are you asking for?
Reread this thread, I am really getting tired of reiterating everything
over and over again.

In a nutshell:
* Lift acls from all discontinued Fedoras
* Keep the buildinfrastructure alive.
* Allow fedora maintainers to fix bugs in discontinued Fedoras.

Alternative: Officially extend Fedora life-times.

Alternative: Discontinue EPEL and replace it a full RHEL/CentOS
derivative as part of Fedora.

Ralf


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux