On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:40 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > > It doesn't have to be, but it might be nice.
> >
> > Hmm, but "it might be nice" isn't a sufficient reason for me to enforce
> > unchangeable tags -- "it has built successfully" would be, though. Or
> > rather, let the successful build trigger the tagging of the built
> > revision.
>
> That's why you have something other than the human apply the immutable
> tag.
>
> The buildsystem would build from the <sha> sum that wouldn't ever
> change. Once a build is actually successful, the n-v-r of that build is
> immutable tagged to the matching <sha> sum by some bot running in the
> build infrastructure.
I agree 100%.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
